CORONAVIRUS VACCINE COMPARISON

CORONAVIRUS VACCINE COMPARISON

Coronavirus Vaccine Comparison – All of vaccines are typically need years for research and testing before it can be used clinically. But some of situation not required that because of emergency state happen in this pandemic era of Corona virus. The emergency of needing the vaccine as one of the prevention step to stop the spreading of the virus so each country developed their own research to make the best vaccine to help their own country and to help our world so we can fight and stand against the COVID-19 together.

So many vaccines are developed in each country around the world. But not all the vaccines are ready to be used. Researchers are currently testing 67 vaccines in clinical trials on humans, and 20 have reached the final stages of testing. At least 89 preclinical vaccines are under active investigation in animals. Some of us maybe didn’t understand about clinical trials, vaccine trials etc. But here some of the information about coronavirus vaccine comparison.1

Also Read COVID-19 and DIABETES

I. The Vaccine Testing Process

An ideal SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, to fight the pandemic, should have the following features:2

  1. Elicit long-lasting protective immune responses;
  2. Should be given to everyone regardless of comorbidity or age, immune status, pregnancy/breastfeeding status;
  3. Lack the potential to cause antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) or pulmonary immunopathology;
  4. Should be thermostable in order to enable transportation and storage in developing countries with poor refrigeration facilities;
  5. Be highly immunogenic in the general population including a population with preexisting anti-vector antibodies.

An experimental vaccine is first tested in animals to evaluate its safety and potential to prevent disease. It is then tested in human clinical trials, in three phases:

  • Phase I – in phase I, the vaccine is given to a small number of volunteers to assess its safety, confirm it generates an immune response, and determine the right dosage.
  • Phase II – in phase II, the vaccine is usually given hundreds of volunteers, who are closely monitored for any side effects, to further assess its ability to generate an immune response. In this phase, data are also collected whenever possible on disease outcomes, but usually not in large enough numbers to have a clear picture of the effect of the vaccine on disease. Participants in this phase have the same characteristics (such as age and sex) as the people for whom the vaccine is intended. In this phase, some volunteers receive the vaccine and others do not, which allows comparison to be made and conclusions drawn about the vaccine.
  • Phase III – in phase III, the vaccine is given to thousands of volunteers – some of whom receive the investigational vaccine, and some of whom do not, just like in phase II trials. Data from both groups is carefully compared to see if the vaccine is safe and effective against the disease it is designed to protect against.

Once the results of clinical trials are available, a series of steps is required, including reviews of efficacy, safety, and manufacturing for regulatory and public health policy approvals, before a vaccine may be introduced into a national immunization program.3

Early or Limited Approval : many countries have given emergency authorization from their government based on preliminary evidence that they are safe and effective.1

Approval : regulators review complete trial results and plans for vaccine’s manufacturing, and decide wheter to give it full approval.1

Combined Phase : one way to accelerate vaccine development is to combine phases. Some vaccines are now in Phase ½ trials, for example, which this tracker would count as both Phase 1 and Phase 2.1

Paused or Abandoned : if investigation observe worrying symptoms in volunteers, they can pause the trial. After an investigation, the trial may resume or be abandoned.1

II. CORONAVIRUS VACCINE COMPARISON

Table 1. Lead SARS-Cov-2 candidate vaccines with EUA granted, in phase III trials, or licensed (prior to phase III trials)3.

coronavirus vaccine comparison

φ Storage or transportation temperature. * SU not defined in trial. A amount of 3 µg was proposed for a phase III trial [30]. 1x = 1 immunization. 2x = 2 immunizations. VP = virus particles. NA = not applicable. ** Phase I/II studies used two different doses: 5×1010 and 1×1011 virus particles [31]. *** Phase I/II studies used 1×1011 virus particles/dose [32]. # Two versions are available: a frozen version and a lyophilized version, Gam-COVID-Vac-lyo, to be reconstituted. % Approved for use in Chinese military. € Approved for use in Russia. ∑ EUA granted. $ NAAT = nucleic acid amplification test.

coronavirus vaccine comparison
coronavirus vaccine comparison
NOCOMPANYVACCINE NAME
1.Pfizer(New York) and BIONTECH (German)Comirnaty (also known as tozinameran or BNT162b2
2.Moderna(Boston) and National Institute of HealthmRNA-1237
3.AstraZaneca(Swedish company) and University of Oxford (England)AZD1222 (also known as Covishield in India )
4.Gamaleya Research Institute (Russia)Sputnik V (also known as Gam-Covid-Vac)
5.Sinovac Biotech (China)CoronaVac (formerly PiCoVacc)
6.Johnson & Johnson/JensenAd26.COV2.S
7.NovavaxNVX-CoV2373
Coronavirus vaccine comparison by name.
  1. Pfizer-BioNTech4

The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine was sent to the FDA for possible Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) on Friday, November 20 and authorized on December 11. It is an mRNA vaccine that codes for the virus’s spike protein and is encapsulated in a lipid nanoparticle. Once injected, the cells churn out the spike protein, triggering the body’s immune system to recognize the virus. In Phase III trials, it demonstrated 95% efficacy. The Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine requires storage at about -94 degrees F, which requires specialized freezers.

Type: mRNA

Doses: 2, 21 Days Apart

EUA Date: December 11, 2020

Price: $19.50 per dose for first 100 million doses

Efficacy: About 95%

Status: Approved in Several Countries-Emergency use in U.S, and elsewhere

2. Moderna

On November 16, Moderna issued a preliminary data readout out of its COVID-19 vaccine, suggesting an efficacy rate of 94.5%. It was authorized by the FDA on December 19. Like the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, it is an mRNA vaccine. Unlike that vaccine, however, the Moderna vaccine is stable at 36 to 46 degrees F, about the temperature of a standard home or medical refrigerator, for up to 30 days and can be stored for up to six months at -4 degrees F. It is expected to go to the FDA for consideration for an EUA within days.

Type: mRNA

Doses: 2, 28 Days Apart

EUA Date: December 18, 2020

Price: $25-$37 per dose

Efficacy: About 95%

Status: Approved in Switzerland, Emergency use in U.S., E.U., Elsewhere

3. AstraZeneca-University of Oxford

On November 23, AstraZeneca and the University of Oxford announced high-level results from an interim analysis of their COVID-19 vaccine, AZD1222. The analysis was from the trials in the UK and Brazil and demonstrated efficacy of up to 90%. The vaccine was effective at preventing COVID-19, with no hospitalizations or severe cases in people receiving it. There were a total of 131 COVID-19 positive cases in the interim analysis group. One dosing regimen was given at a half dose and demonstrated 90% efficacy, followed by a full dose at least one month apart. Another dosing regimen demonstrated 62% efficacy when given two full doses at least one month apart. The combined analysis showed average efficacy of 70%. The AstraZeneca vaccine can be stored, transported and handled at normal refrigerated conditions, about 36-46 degrees F for at least six months and administered within existing healthcare settings.

The AstraZeneca and University of Oxford’s vaccine uses technology from an Oxford spinout company, Vaccitech. It deploys a replication-deficient chimpanzee viral vector based on a weakened version of a common cold virus (adenovirus) that causes infections in chimpanzees. It contains the genetic materials of the spike protein. After vaccination, the cells produce the spike protein, stimulating the immune system to attack the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Type: Adenovirus-based

Doses: 2, 28 Days Apart

Likely EUA Date: Authorized in Europe on January 12, 2021, and other countries, but unlikely in the U.S. until spring

Price: $25-$37 per dose

Efficacy: Currently about 70% overall

Status : Emergency use in Britain, E.U., Elsewhere 

4. Russia’s Sputnik V Vaccine

Around November 11, Russia’s National Research Center for Epidemiology and Microbiology, which Russia authorized for use in August ahead of even beginning a Phase III trial claimed had an efficacy rate of 92% after the second dose. It was based on a first interim analysis 21 days after the first injection during the ongoing Phase III study. On November 24, the organization claimed 95% efficacy based on new preliminary data. On December 14, 2020, they reported efficacy of 91.4%. It also offered to share one of its two human adenoviral vectors with AstraZeneca to increase the efficacy of the AstraZeneca vaccine.

Russia’s Gamaleya research institute appears to be focused on potentially marketing their vaccine worldwide. Even the name of the vaccine has emphasized the idea of a race. The organization has indicated a dose of the vaccine will cost no more than $10, about half the cost of the Pfizer vaccine. The organization has also predicted they could produce 1 billion doses in the next year. At this time, aside from Russia, it will potentially be sold in India, Korea, Brazil, China, and Hungary. The Hungarian government is the only European Union country to express interest to date.

Type: Adenovirus-based

Doses: 2

Likely EUA Date: Not applicable in the U.S.

Price: $10 per dose

Efficacy: 91.4%

Status: Early use in Russia, Emergency use Elsewhere

5. Sinovac Biotech

On January 13, 2021, China-based Sinovac Biotech reported that its COVID-19 vaccine had a 50.38% efficacy in late-stage clinical trials in Brazil. The company’s clinical trials are demonstrating dramatically varying efficacy rates. In Indonesia, a local trial demonstrated an efficacy rate of 65%, but the trial had only 1,620 participants. Turkey reported an efficacy rate of 91.25% in December 2020. Another trial in Brazil run by a local partner, Butantan Institute, reported last week a 78% efficacy rate in mild cases while 100% against severe and moderate infections. It is an inactivated vaccine that uses inactivated SARS-CoV-2 viruses.

Type: Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 virus

Doses: 2

Likely EUA Date: Not applicable in the U.S.

Price: $13,6 (Indonesia)5

Efficacy: 50.38% to 91.25%, depending on the clinical trial

Status: Approved in China, Emergency use Elsewhere

6. Johnson & Johnson

Johnson & Johnson announced on November 15 that it initiated a second global Phase III trial of its Janssen COVID-19 vaccine. They expect to enroll up to 60,000 volunteers worldwide.

Whereas all of the other three vaccine candidates require two doses about 28 days apart, the J&J vaccine only requires a single dose. Interim results from its Phase I/IIa trial demonstrated a single dose of the vaccine induced a robust immune response and was generally well-tolerated. The ENSEMBLE 2 study evaluated a two-dose regimen as well.

The vaccine uses the company’s AdVac technology platform, which it used to develop its approved Ebola vaccine and its Zika, RSV and HIV investigational vaccine candidates. It revolves around the use of an inactivated common cold virus, similar to what the AstraZeneca-University of Oxford program utilizes.

On February 4, Johnson & Johnson announced that it has filled for an emergency use authorization in the U.S. The FDA has scheduled a meeting of the committee that makes vaccine recommendations on February 26, and a decision could follow shortly afterward.  

Type: Adenovirus-based

Doses: 1

Likely EUA Date: Possibly March or April 2021

Price: $10 per dose

Efficacy: 72% in the U.S., 66% overall, 85% for preventing severe disease 

Status: Phase 3

7. NOVAVAX

Maryland-based Novavax makes vaccines by sticking proteins onto microscopic particles. They’ve taken on a number of different diseases this way; their flu vaccine finished Phase 3 clinical trials last March. The company launched trials for a Covid-19 vaccine in May, and the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations invested $384 million to support research on the vaccine. In July the U.S. government awarded Novavax another $1.6 billion to support the vaccine’s clinical trials and manufacturing.

On January 28, 2021, Novavax announced that its COVID-19 vaccine, NVX-CoV2373, hit the primary endpoint with a vaccine efficacy of 89.3% in its Phase III trial in the UK. The vaccine is a protein-based COVID-19 vaccine candidate. It also has data from the South Africa Phase IIb trial and several Phase I, II and III trials. It has demonstrated high clinical efficacy against the UK and South Africa variants as well.

The vaccine contains a full-length, prefusion spike protein made using the company’s recombinant nanoparticle technology and its proprietary saponin-based Matrix-M adjuvant. It is stable at 2 to 8 degrees C and shipped in a ready-to-use liquid formulation.

Type: Protein-based vaccine

Doses: 2

Likely EUA Date: Possibly in March or February 2021 in the UK; possibly Q1 2021 or later in the U.S.

Price: $16 in the US

Efficacy: 89.3%

That’s it. The article about Coronavirus Vaccine Comparison. If you like to see another article, please follow the link below.

Also Read Delaying second dose of coronavirus vaccines is ‘risky gamble’: according to experts

Coronavirus Vaccine Comparison

REFFERENCES

  1. Carl Zimmer, Jonathan Corum, Sui-Lee Wee. Coronavirus Vaccine Comparison Tracker.2 February 2021. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/science/coronavirus-vaccine-tracker.html?auth=link-dismiss-google1tap
  2. Gregory A.Poland, MD; Inna G. Ovsyannikova, PhD; Stephen N.Crooke. SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Development: Current Status. 2020. Mayo Clinic. Access: 6 February 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.07.021
  3. WHO. Vaccines and Immunization: What is vaccination?. Access: 4 February 2021.  https://www.who.int/news-room/q-a-detail/vaccines-and-immunization-what-is-vaccination?adgroupsurvey={adgroupsurvey}&gclid=CjwKCAiA9vOABhBfEiwATCi7GA4Q0gma7eld7lLLdXFkF64O_a9BqrMusUos10__fOldtUZX9fbpfhoCpxAQAvD_BwE)
  4. Mark Terry. UPDATED Comparing COVID-19 Vaccines: Timelines, Types and Prices. Access: 4 February 2021. https://www.biospace.com/article/comparing-covid-19-vaccines-pfizer-biontech-moderna-astrazeneca-oxford-j-and-j-russia-s-sputnik-v/
  5. Milton Lum, Dr. Covid-19 Vaccine Prices. Code Blue, Health is Human Right. December 2020. Access : https://codeblue.galencentre.org/2020/12/25/covid-19-vaccine-prices/ 16 February 2021
PEDIATRIC ASTHMA AND COVID-19

PEDIATRIC ASTHMA AND COVID-19

Pediatric Asthma And Covid-19 – Asthma is a heterogeneous disease, usually characterized by chronic airway inflammation. It is defined by the history of respiratory symptoms such as wheeze, shortness of breath, chest tightness and cough that vary over time and in intensity, together with variable expiratory.

I. DEFINITION Of ASTHMA

Asthma is the most prevalent chronic respiratory disease worldwide, affected people all ethnic groups throughout all ages. Asthma also the most common chronic disease in children. Asthma can’t go away, but it can be reduced to become more severe. But its still become significant public health problem. Furthermore, asthma disproportionately affects minorities and socioeconomically disadvantages children.2

II. EPIDEMIOLOGICAL AND PREVALENCE

From epidemiological and experimental studies shows that there is relationship between environmental factors and allergic r4espiratory disease such as rhinitis and asthma.3 Air pollution could be the reason of each asthma cases in the Asia Pacific especially in urban cities with rapid developing economics, increasing infrastructure, numbers of vehicles, and reduced green spaces. Fossil fuel and transportation are the main sources of air pollution (e.g., sulfur oxide and nitrous) released into the atmosphere leading to health problems. A global study that 9–23 million and 5–10 million annual asthma emergency room visits globally in 2015 could be attributable to O3 and particulate matter (PM) with a diameter of 2.5 μm or less (PM2.5), respectively, representing 8%–20% and 4%–9% of the annual number of global visits, respectively.3

The top 3 countries for both asthma incidence and prevalence in Asia were India, China, and Indonesia, driven largely by population size nearly half (48%) of estimated O3-attributable and over half (56%) of PM2.5-attributable asthma emergency room visits were estimated in Southeast Asia (includes India), and western Pacific regions (includes China). Of all countries globally, India and China had the most estimated asthma emergency room visits attributable to total air pollution concentrations, respectively contributing 23% and 10% of global asthma emergency room visits estimated to be associated with O3, 30% and 12% for PM2.5, and 15% and 17% for nitrogen dioxide (NO2). In this global study,16 million new pediatric asthma cases could occur globally each year due to anthropogenic PM2.5 concentrations, translating to 33% of global pediatric asthma incidence. The percentage of national pediatric asthma incidence that may be attributable to anthropogenic PM2.5 was estimated to be 57% in India, 51% in China, and over 70% in Bangladesh.3

Asthma affects 1 in 12 US children aged 0 through 17 years. After decades of increases, the prevalence of asthma in this group plateaued between 2010 and 2012, decreased in 2013 from 9.3% in 2012 to 8.3%, and remained stable through 2016. In contrast, pediatric asthma prevalence in black children increased between 2001 and 2009, leveling off by 2013. In 2016, asthma prevalence in black children rose sharply to 15.7% (a 2.3% increase from 2014 and 2015), twice that of white children. This rate surpassed that of Puerto Rican children, who previously had the highest prevalence of asthma of all US children. The prevalence of asthma in children in poverty did not decrease between 2001 and 2013 and remained high in 2016 (10.5%).2

pediatric asthma and covid
Picture 1. Asthma Prevalence in Indonesia in all ages, 2013-20184

Percentages asthma more higher  in the city than villagers

Asthma has become an issue of international development as its economic and social cost have been recognized. Asthma is one of the chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs), CRD’s ) including asthma cause 15% of world deaths. Strangely we still didn’t understand exactly what can cause number of asthma increasing each year.

III. RISK FACTORS ASTHMA IN CHILDHOOD

  1. Microbial Exposure

Hygiene and environment have been suggested to become cause problem increasing the risk of asthma. Accordingly, children raised in modern environment with a scanty natural microbial burden may be prone to develop allergic diseases in view of an under stimulation of the immune system. Indeed, recent evidences showed that exposure to some microbes can protect from atopy, whereas others seem to promote allergic diseases. The timing of exposure to as well as the properties of the infectious agent, in addition to the genetic susceptibility of the host, may influence the future development of asthma.5

Data from the Copenhagen birth cohort first showed that infants carrying 3 major pathogenic bacteria in their nasopharynx (ie, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Moraxella catharralis, and Haemophilus influenzae) were more likely to develop asthma by the age of 6 years than those not carrying these microbes.6

2. Atopy

Word atopy originally from the Greek “atopos” meaning out of place.(William C. Shiel Jr., MD, FACP, FACR, Medical Definition of Atopy. Atopy is typically associated with heightened immune responses to common allergens, especially inhaled allergens and food allergens. ATOPY DEFINITION, American Academy of Allergy Asthma & Immunology). Data from epidemiological studies showed the strong link between asthma and atopy. Indeed, the family history of atopy is considered one of the most relevant risk factors for developing asthma.5Atopy refers to the genetic tendency to develop allergic diseases such as allergic rhinitis, asthma, atopic dermatitis (eczema) .

From a study showed that children who were sensitized to 1 or more aeroallergens by age 1 year had the highest rate of asthma at year 13. Children who were not sensitized at year 1 but sensitized to 1 or more aeroallergens by age 5 years had a 40% rate of asthma at age 13 years.7

3. Environmental Exposure

The increasing case of asthma in metropolitan areas was possibly because of their air pollution. An evidence from a study showed evidence that increased childhood exposure to PM2,5 and black carbon was associated with increased risk of asthma at age 12 years.5 According to the WHO, nearly one million of the 3.7 million people who died from ambient air pollution in 2021 lived in South-East Asia. Several areas in Indonesia such as Sumatra and Borneo island resulted in spikes of increased pollution and health hazard by produced smoke haze.3 Several studies have linked the smoke and haze produced by the fires to chronic respiratory problems.

Living in an environment where the number of smokers are high mainly can cause lung damage eventually when it happens near of children area or even to a pregnancy. Several negative effects of nicotine exposure on structural and functional development of the fetal lung were established, such as alteration of the alveolar phase, damage of the epithelial cells of type I, inhibition of fibroblast proliferation, reduction of the small airways caliber, increase of the muscular tone, and reduction of lung compliance. Exposure during pregnancy may be responsible for permanent modifications of the respiratory tract that can persist into adulthood and might culminate in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.7

IV. COVID-19 IN CHILDREN WITH ASTHMA

In fact, there is still no reported cases of asthma in pediatric can be the risk factor of covid-19. Children are less commonly symptomatic with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) than adults. Those who are symptomatic less commonly require hospitalization. Among 96% of cases where age was known, only 8,1% was among children less than 18 years of age. A report of 12.055 COVID-19 patients in Italy also supports a lower risk in children, although noting that COVID-19 can affect children of any age, including infants.8

Multiple international organizations including the CDC list asthma as a prognostic factor for COVID-19 outcomes such as morbidity and mortality. There is also a theoretical risk that COVID-19 could trigger viral-induced asthma exacerbations but still no data to support.   

The clinical course of COVID-19 in children is usually milder than in adults. A study stated that 23% of children with severe form of the disease have an underlying condition.9

  • PEDIATRIC ASTHMA AND COVID-19 DIAGNOSIS

Diagnosis of pediatric asthma and covid -19 during COVID-19 Pandemic may be complicated by a similarity in symptoms between COVID-19 (dry cough, shortness of breath) and worsening asthma. As a result, even if cough history is consistent with asthma, screening protocols for COVID-19 should be applied to all children who have worsening cough or shortness of breath, and appropriate personal protective equipment worn.8

lung function test such as spirometry is specific test for diagnosing a asthma, but in terms of COVID-19 pandemic The North American guidance on passed resumption of allergy care during COVID-19 notes that for Phase 2 rollout (community infection risk declining/stable) “spirometry is still contraindicated in most scenarios because of the aerosolization risk, except in highly individualized situations in which it would be essential for immediate treatment decision that could not otherwise be made without such information and where it can be performed with appropriate precautions and room/equipment disinfection.8

  • What is parents have to know if their kids develop an asthma during this Corona Virus pandemic?

Differentiating COVID-19 from worsening asthma, or an asthma exacerbation, is challenging. As a result, pediatricians and families have an essential role in ensuring that children with asthma maintain good asthma control during this time.10

Multiple international guidelines support children with asthma remaining on their maintenance asthma medications, such as inhaled corticosteroids or antileukotrienes, during COVID-19 if they are well controlled. A statement from the European Academy of Allergy Asthma and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) notes that “since asthma itself may be a risk factor for the severity of COVID‐19 disease and since the use of ICS does not pose an increased risk for pulmonary or systemic infections in children with asthma, their regular use is unlikely to increase the risk of acquiring the infection or increasing the severity of the present infection.8

Children and adolescents with asthma should remain on their current asthma medications and still practice social distancing and make sure to avoid aeroallergen also exposure to second-hand cigarette smoking10, because it can increase the expression of the ACE2 receptors in the lower respiratory tract, which is the coronavirus receptor. Which ACE2 as the receptor for Sars-CoV-2 means it will increase susceptibility to contract the COVID-19 infection and potentially to develop a more severe form.8

pediatric asthma and covid

REFERRENCES

  1. GINA committees. POCKET GUIDE FOR ASTHMA MANAGEMENT AND PREVENTION for adults and children older than 5 years.2019. Access : https://ginasthma.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/GINA-2019-main-report-June-2019-wms.pdf
  2. Shilpa J. Patel, MD,MPH, Stephen J. Teach, MD, MPH. Asthma. Pediatrics in Review, An Official Journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. Vol 40 No II November 2019. Division of Emergency Medicine, Children’s National Medical Center, Washington, DC. Access : http://pedsinreview.aappublications.org/
  3. Ruby Pawankar, Jiu-Yao Wang, I-Jen Wang, Francis Thien. White Paper 2020 on Climate Change, Air Pollution, and Biodiversity in Asia-Pacific and Impact on Allergic Disease. Asia Pacific Association of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology. 2020. Jan;10(1):e11. Access :  https://doi.org/10.5415/apallergy.2020.10.e11
  4. Kementerian Kesehatan RI. Hasil Utama RISKESDAS 2018. Penyakit Tidak Menular, Prevalensi Asma. Access : https://kesmas.kemkes.go.id/assets/upload/dir_519d41d8cd98f00/files/Hasil-riskesdas-2018_1274.pdf
  5. Giuliana Ferrante and Stefania La Grutta. The Burden of Pediatric Asthma. Frontiers in Pediatric. June 2018. Volume 6. Article 186. Access : Frontiers | The Burden of Pediatric Asthma | Pediatrics (frontiersin.org)  
  6. Fernando D. Martinez, MD. Childhood Asthma Inception and Progression Role of Microbial Exposures, Susceptibility to Viruses and Early Allergic Sensitization. Elsevier Ltd. Volume 39, Issue 2. 2019. P 141-150. Access : Childhood Asthma Inception and Progression: Role of Microbial Exposures, Susceptibility to Viruses and Early Allergic Sensitization – ScienceDirect
  7. Frederick J. Rubner, MD, Daniel J. Jackson, MD, Michael D. Evans, MS. Early life rhinovirus wheezing, allergic sensitization, and asthma risk at adolescence. 2017. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. Asthma and Lower Airway Disease. Volume 139, issue 2, P501-507. Early life rhinovirus wheezing, allergic sensitization, and asthma risk at adolescence – Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (jacionline.org)
  8. Elissa M.Abrams MD, FRCPC. Ian Sinha MBBS, FRCPCH, PhD. Pediatric Asthma and COVID-19: The known, the unknown, and the controversial. Wiley Periodicals LLC: Pediatric Pulmonology. 2020; 55:3573-3578. DOI: 10.1002/ppul.25117
  9. M. Kamali Aghdam, M. Sadeghzadeh, S. Sadeghzadeh and K. Namakin. Challenges in A Child with Asthma and COVId-19. Elsevier Ltd. 2020. New Microbe and new Infections, Vol 37 Number C. Access : Challenges in a child with asthma and COVID-19 – ScienceDirect
  10. Elissa M. Abrams, MD, MPH, and Stanley J. Szefler, MD. Managing Asthma during Coronavirus Disease-2019: An Example for Other Chronic Conditions in Children and Adolescents. The Journal of Pediatrics. Vol 222. July 2020. Access: https://www.jpeds.com/article/S0022-3476(20)30528-X/fulltext
What are the differences of these various COVID-19 vaccines?

What are the differences of these various COVID-19 vaccines?

Sinovac

Various COVID 19 vaccines in Beijing-based biopharmaceutical company Sinovac is behind the CoronaVac, an inactivated vaccine.

It works by using killed viral particles to expose the body’s immune system to the virus without risking a serious disease response.

By comparison the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines being developed in the West are mRNA vaccines. This means part of the coronavirus’ genetic code is injected into the body, triggering the body to begin making viral proteins, but not the whole virus, which is enough to train the immune system to attack.

On paper, one of Sinovac’s main advantages is that it can be stored in a standard refrigerator at 2-8 degrees Celsius, like the Oxford vaccine, which is made from a genetically engineered virus that causes the common cold in chimpanzees.1

While the three COVID-19 vaccines – from Pfizer/BioNtech, Moderna and Oxford/AstraZeneca – look set to be the most common ones for Europeans.

While they all have the same goal, there are substantial differences between the jabs, from their composition and reported effectiveness, to their price and ease of conservation and distribution.

It means that both Sinovac and the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine are a lot more useful to developing countries that might not be able to store large amounts of vaccine at such low temperatures.

Pfizer/BioNtech and Moderna

The Pfizer vaccine, like the Moderna one, use innovative messenger RNA technology. In short, this technology teaches our cells how to produce a protein, which is what makes the immune system react.

It is claimed their efficiency in successfully fighting COVID-19, at up to 95%, is higher than that of AstraZeneca.

Both, however, are more expensive.

The big drawback of Pfizer’s jab is that it needs to be stored in the extreme cold, at temperatures as low as -70C to -80C. Moderna’s can remain stable for 30 days at a temperature of between 2C and 8C, but for longer periods it will have to be frozen at -20C.

Oxford/AstraZeneca

Compared to Pfizer and Moderna, AstraZeneca’s jab uses a more traditional vaccine technique, using an attenuated version of the virus that causes the common cold in chimpanzees.

This virus has been genetically altered with a gene for a coronavirus protein to provoke the body’s immune reaction.

Its efficiency rate is lower at around 70%. But, under certain conditions, this can be as high as 90%.

But it is a lot cheaper and easier to store than Pfizer’s vaccine. The AstraZeneca vaccine can survive in a standard refrigerator for up to six months, whereas the Pfizer one needs temperatures of up to -80℃.2

That’s all for the various covid 19 vaccines hope this article help you!

Also Read Indonesia COVID vaccination to start Wednesday using Sinovac drug

RESOURCE:

  1. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-55212787
  2. Carmen Menéndez  & Lucía Riera. 
  3. https://www.euronews.com/2020/12/31/what-are-the-differences-between-the-three-main-covid-19-vaccines
News Link Updated from 20th Sep 2020
News Link Updated From 8th Sep 2020
News Link Updated From 3rd Aug 2020